Brookline Educators Union

  • Home
    • About the BEU
    • Leadership
      • Officers
      • Consultants / Committee Chairs
      • Executive Board
      • Grievance Team
      • Building Representative Council
      • Health & Safety Committee
    • Contact
  • Negotiations Blog
  • News
    • BEU Newsletter
    • Solidarity Bulletins
    • Outside Press
    • Galleries
  • Parents & Community
    • Information
    • Allies
    • Community Events
  • Member Discussion
  • Documents
    • Contracts
    • Member Information and Forms
    • BEU Bylaws
  • First-Time Login?

BACK TO SCHOOL!

May 17, 2022

The Brookline Educators Union and the Brookline School Committee signed a tentative agreement at 4:20 am on May 17.   

Educators will return to the buildings later this morning.

The BEU will join members of other unions and allies to celebrate the victory and exercise solidarity in a 3:30pm rally at Brookline Town Hall with other union locals that are fighting for fair contracts!

Filed Under: Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

School Committee Forces BEU to Strike

May 15, 2022

Following over eight and a half hours of bargaining through the night, the Brookline School Committee failed to address the issues necessary to reach a contract agreement with the Brookline Educators Union, forcing educators to strike beginning Monday. 

 

Throughout bargaining Saturday night into early Sunday morning, the Brookline School Committee refused educators’ need for:

 

  • Guaranteed daily duty free prep time
  • Guaranteed time for colleagues to collaborate weekly
  • Substantive action on attracting and retaining educators of color

 

The School Committee also would not present any proposals on the record. In addition, the BEU has agreed to a financial package that acknowledges the town’s fiscal mismanagement while standing firm that educators will not allow their wages to further erode. 

The BEU has greatly pared down its list of original proposals to bare essentials. The BEU has made financial proposals that give the town tremendous flexibility to plan and prepare. The BEU has asked the superintendent to go beyond existing practices and consider using existing laws and policies to attract and retain educators of color and to commit to creating a report on the district’s workforce in regards to racial diversity and inclusion. 

 

The School Committee is hiding behind a questionable interpretation of the Open Meeting Law to avoid bargaining that could prevent a strike.

 

Brookline educators can no longer tolerate the School Committee’s dismissive attitude toward educators or its willingness to dismantle the quality of our schools.  

 

We remain open to negotiating with the School Committee throughout Sunday and beyond, to resolve a fair contract that preserves the working and learning conditions that our students and educators deserve.

Filed Under: Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations, Uncategorized Tagged With:

Without Contract, Brookline Educators Authorize Strike for Monday, May 16

May 12, 2022

 

The members of the Brookline Educators Union overwhelmingly voted on Thursday evening to authorize a strike to begin Monday, May 16, should the Brookline School Committee and the BEU bargaining team fail to reach an agreement this weekend. The BEU and its supporters will be holding a rally at 10 a.m. Saturday at Brookline Town Hall. The BEU issued the following statement following the vote:

Brookline educators have been working for nearly three years without a contract that addresses fair and reasonable compensation as well as working conditions that meet the realities of a modern, comprehensive education. We have been patient. We have been bargaining in good faith. The Brookline Educators Union has never walked away from the bargaining table, contrary to what the School Committee claims. 

Educators are simply fed up with the Brookline School Committee’s approach to bargaining – or rather its active avoidance of serious bargaining.  

The BEU is adamant that agreements on the time that educators must prepare for their work with students, the time that they have to collaborate with colleagues and the ability for the district to attract and retain educators of color are not only legal subjects of bargaining but also of immense importance to the quality of education provided to the students in Brookline.  The fact that the School Committee deems these concerns unworthy of discussion demonstrates a disheartening disregard for educators; it is also alarming evidence of the extent to which the committee is willing to erode the quality of education provided by Public Schools of Brookline.

Assertions by the School Committee and others about lower student enrollment are distractions. The needs of our students are greater than ever before, and the expectations of public schools to support the emotional and social as well as the academic needs of students have never been higher. 

The inexcusable delays in settling contracts and the complete unwillingness to even talk about issues that have such an impact on students and the quality of education that we provide them have brought us to a point where Brookline educators must take bold action. We will no longer stand for the disrespect displayed in the approach to bargaining nor stand by while the School Committee persists in gutting a school system that many have considered to be not only among the best in the state but the best in the country. That quality is a product of the work done by the teachers, related service providers, aides, librarians, counselors, coaches, and staff working directly and daily with our students. We will always fight for what our students need and deserve.

Filed Under: Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

BEU submits counter-offer to School Committee on May 10, 2022

May 10, 2022

The BEU is pleased that the School Committee is finally countering our proposals – after months and months of showing no willingness to move and stalling negotiations at every turn. Contrary to what the School Committee has stated, we did not walk away from the table on May 9 and we made a counter proposal prior to their last proposal of the evening (which was an increase from their prior offer of ½ % more over 6 years). We have just sent the School Committee our latest counter proposal. We hope that the School Committee will work with us intensively in the next 2 days to reach a tentative agreement that can be signed by Thursday at 5 pm so the BEU can hold a ratification vote at our scheduled 7pm General Meeting.

Here’s what the BEU has proposed today (May 10) as a counter to the School Committee’s salary offer:

 

— 6% over three years, plus a 1% increase to start the following year for all money items 

— 8% over the following three years, plus a 1% increase  to start the following year for all money items.

 

We feel this is quite fair, as it meets the School Committee almost where they were, and by putting money on the end of the contract it gives them time to find the money to fund their contractual obligations. Our proposal also includes stipends and longevity.  Longevity payments allow the 37% of educators who only get a cost of living increase to attempt to keep up with rising costs, showing that Brookline values our most experienced educators.

 

We insist on keeping working conditions proposals and racial justice provisions in our proposal, as they speak to the crushing workload and need for collaboration time that many of our members face and the importance of retaining our educators of color. However, despite many concessions and compromises that the BEU offered on these provisions over the past two years (including this week), the School Committee has steadfastly refused to offer any counter proposals about working conditions – directly impacting the conditions for students in the classroom!

Filed Under: Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

Our Educators’ Working Conditions are our Students’ Learning Conditions — response to SC

May 10, 2022

It is important to clarify a few points regarding negotiations between the  Brookline Educators Union and the Brookline School Committee.

The school committee’s message sent last night did not tell the whole story. The BEU did not “walk out” on mediation last night, and is taking the last school committee proposal under advisement.  Furthermore, the BEU has in fact made counter offers on the economic proposals, but the School Committee has refused to address our proposals on working conditions and racial justice. We have made proposals regarding prep and planning time and proposals aimed at attracting and retaining educators of color.

These proposals are based on the professional judgment of educators that will benefit our students.

Yet to the school committee, these proposals are not even worth talking about.

The committee also is trying to sell the old trope that educators receive annual “step raises.”  Steps are not raises; steps represent the base pay for educators stretched out across several years. Compared to other professions, educators agree to wait several years before achieving maximum potential earnings. They do this to help the municipalities that they work for. Raises are the actual increases in pay to address the rising cost of living. 

As it stands now, the movement we saw last night is not concrete and the School Committee can withdraw its offers. The BEU is asking the School Committee to sign a written agreement by 5 p.m. Thursday. 

The School Committee has time to make serious, concrete offers that address our concerns. The BEU bargaining team is ready to negotiate. We are ready to settle if the committee speaks to the two non-monetary issues that are crucial to the quality of education that we provide our students. We are also ready to take further action if the School Committee continues to ignore its obligation to bargain over our working conditions which are our students’ learning conditions.

Thank you for your solidarity and for the support that you give to our students every day.

Filed Under: Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

Brookline has no excuse for its failure to agree to a fair contract

April 26, 2022

 

 

On March 25, 2022, the Brookline Educators Union (BEU) submitted an on-the-record proposal to the Brookline School Committee (BSC) in lieu of a mediation session that had been canceled that day. The concept behind the proposal was to create more stability in our schools by settling the current contract for Units A and B (9/1/2020-8/31/2023) AND the successor contract (9/01/2023-8/31/2026) for Units A, B and Para at the same time.  In addition to the value of the substance of the proposals, the BEU sees many benefits for both sides to enter into the non-traditional agreement between the BEU and the Public Schools of Brookline. However, on April 8, 2022, the School Committee rejected the proposal outright. In an all to familiar approach, they showed no interest in exploring the idea with us with an eye toward working creatively with us. 

 

The BEU and the BSC have been engaged in collective bargaining for the better part of the last four years. For three years in a row, teachers have started school with an expired contract.  It is past time to introduce more stability than this into the school system.

 

TIMELINE — THE CONTRACTS ARE EXPIRED AND DO NOT MEET CURRENT NEEDS

 

  • In the winter of the 2018-2019 school year when Andrew Bott was superintendent, the two sides entered into bargaining of a successor contract to the 2016-2019 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with an end date that coming August. Protracted negotiations were still underway during the following 2019-2020 school year when Covid hit in March.
  • While the BSC and the BEU were bargaining the first COVID MOA, both sides agreed to a one year, money only contract that covered that current 2019-2020 school year.  
  • A second Covid MOA was negotiated, now for the 2020-2021 school year, and now with a second another interim superintendent, Jim Marini, in the district. The MOA was settled in December of 2020 only after the BEU was forced to engage in a one day strike to get the district to agree to six foot distancing in classrooms.  
  • Bargaining resumed for the successor 2020-2023 CBA but was sidelined when the BSC triggered a clause in the COVID MOA that would cut distancing in the 2nd MOA to three feet. Sessions on Covid matters concluded with no agreement in March of 2021. The district implemented three foot distancing as the original second COVID MOA allowed them to impose a change after a limited number of sessions.  
  • Negotiations resumed for the 2020-2023 CBA in May and June of 2021 with several marathon sessions.  During these sessions, the current rate of inflation was raised as a key concern by the BEU.  In an effort to get an agreement, the BEU consolidated over 15 pages of non-wage proposals for improving schools into five proposals addressing pay, hiring and retention of staff of color, preparation time, and a joint labor-management committee to analyze the “teacher day” as defined in the CBA. The BSC only countered with wage proposals that didn’t come close to keeping up with Cost of Living increases as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and rejected out of hand the proposals dealing with staff retention and unsustainable workday obligations.
  • A paraprofessional agreement was reached, however, and ratified on June 30, 2021.
  • In October 2021, with a new superintendent, Dr. Guillory, a 3rd Covid MOA was settled with the school committee with CBA negotiations suspended because the District had said they would not negotiate COVID and the CBA simultaneously. 
  • In November 2021, CBA negotiations began again. While the BEU submitted the same proposals that had been on the table in May and June, the BSC added completely new  proposals that significantly curtailed union rights, exercise of professional judgment by teachers, and lengthened the contractual workday for elementary (k-8) teachers.  When the BEU wouldn’t accept uncompensated added work time or pay in general that didn’t even keep up with inflation, the BSC filed for mediation, which the BEU opposed. Initially the Board of Labor Relations agreed with the BEU that the two sides had not met enough times for there to be a mediator assigned, the BSC forced the issue by being unwavering on pay increases that were half the rate of projected Cost of Living over the life of the contract and by refusing to rescind the late-added items of extending the school day and diminishing the rights educators and the BEU.

 

EXCELLENT SCHOOLS WITH FAIR CONTRACTS ARE FOUNDATIONS OF THE TOWN’S FISCAL HEALTH

 

As the sides prepared for mediation, the BEU formed a data team that looked closely at the town’s financial picture and demographic trends in order to see if Brookline was as “broke” as the school committee claimed in negotiations sessions.  We also looked at the stability of school staffing because the core of schools is its educators.

 

In regard to town revenue, even aside from the $25+ million dollars that the town has spent to acquire property this year, the BEU found that the town of Brookline has the ability, capacity, and obligation to increase ad/or reallocate revenue to fund what the BEU has demanded at the bargaining table.

  

  • Over the last five years, the town of Brookline has amassed an annual excess of $5.9 million in tax receipts than estimates used for the purpose of fiscal planning.   
  • Brookline’s tax rate is well below the state average. It is 31st lowest in the state.  
  • Thus, while tax bills may be high due to high property values, the cost of owning high priced houses in Brookline is well below the cost in other districts.  
  • “Living well” costs less in Brookline than it does elsewhere, and because of this, there is an excess capacity to tax under Prop 2.5 of close to half a BILLION dollars in the town of Brookline.  
  • Residents in town have seen their median household income increase almost 14% between fiscal years 2016-2019 while teacher cost of living (COLA) increases during that time averaged less than half of that.  In fact, income growth in town from FY2010 through FY2019 increased almost 42.5% while salary growth for teachers with a masters degree at top step only increased about 23%.  

 

BROOKLINE EDUCATORS ARE LEAVING

 

Clearly there is an ability and an argument to increase revenue in town, but there is also a need to weigh how existing revenue is allocated.   

 

It is well known that property values on which revenue depends are driven by the quality of public schools, and that quality is first and foremost a reflection of the quality of teaching.  Our classroom educators and related service providers are our students’ greatest source of stability in a school system that has had 6 superintendents in 7 years and an unusually high turnover of principals and central administrators.

 

In the absence of a contract that is more fair, Brookline’s educators, including much needed teachers, paraprofessionals, and related service providers, are leaving the district.  Before COVID hit, Brookline had the lowest rate of retention among peer districts with just under 85%.  For reference, Newton was at 89% and Wellesley, Needham, Lincoln / Sudbury, Lexington, and Concord / Carlisle were over 90% staff retention rates.  Through February of this year, Brookline remains among the lowest retention rates of peer districts at just under 83%. Weston and Wellesley are comparable in these numbers, but both have CBA’s where top earners make more than Brookline teachers.  Districts such as Newton and Concord Carlisle pay their veteran teachers more than Brookline as well.  

 

SETTLING LONG-TERM, FAIR CONTRACTS IS GOOD FOR BROOKLINE

On April 19, 2022, the Select Board released $3.5 million of federal Covid emergency funds to the schools.  Now it is time to agree to a fair contract.  Past time.

 

All budgets and all contracts commit to costs that stretch into the future and it is past time that the first priority be a commitment to the teaching staff. The BEU’s current proposal makes this planning easier than usual by giving the town even more time to reallocate and/or increase revenue. This includes using federal emergency Covid funds as a bridge to shifting its priorities to providing such supports. 

 

The union’s idea that the School Committee rejected proposed settling two contracts for a total of six years (two of the years are already in the rear view mirror) which would have begun to erase the labor strife and uncertainty that teachers, administrators, and district leaders have endured for too many years. The cost of this labor peace proposed by the BEU would have been less than 3% per year with increases can be back loaded to allow time for much needed overrides and / or a true needs assessment and stakeholder review of where money is being spent and why by town leaders.  These needs in the buildings have been identified by educators and outside reviews such as the most recent assessment of the Special Education Program Review which noted significant shortcomings in staffing levels and opportunities for all students, general and special ed, to access adequate academic and social emotional support.  

 

Brookline schools have been a shining light in the state for a long time.  In order to begin the work to build them back to where they should be, accept this contract proposal and let us get back to work with job security and retention fears allayed.  The BEU proposals help provide the foundation on which educators can address the needs of the district and make it everything it once was.

 

—  Eric Schiff, Chair, for the BEU Negotiating Team

Filed Under: Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

Did You Know Brookline Educators STILL Don’t Have a Contract?

April 7, 2022

 

Teachers, related service providers, and administrators in the Brookline Educators Union (BEU) remain without a long-term contract this spring after starting the school year without one for the third straight year.

 

Educator morale is at an all time low.  Limits on staffing, lack of common planning blocks, and pay that is not keeping pace with inflation is putting retention of excellent educators at risk, including our much needed staff of color.  This also puts our students at risk. Brookline’s overall retention rate stood at 88.3% in 2009. In 2019 before Covid, when comparable districts were hitting about 90%, Brookline had slipped to 84.5%.  Today, retention is even worse. 

 

Our classroom educators and related service providers are our students’ greatest source of stability in a school system that has had 6 superintendents in 7 years and an unusually high turnover of principals and central administrators.  Making a commitment to educators in writing, one that prioritizes a) working conditions that enable excellent teaching, and b) economic fairness, is long overdue.

 

The BEU seeks community support for:

 

  • A Just Wage: Our salary proposals allow for time to fund cost-of-living increases that are closer to 3% a year than 2%.
  • Common Planning Time: Add planning blocks with no loss of instructional time in order to facilitate collaboration across grade levels, academic departments, and schools.
  • Adequate Staffing: Maintain current staff, and hire additional Paraprofessionals from Brookline and Boston neighborhoods of our underrepresented students to cover building duties, increase the diversity of our staff, and open up time for educators to provide individualized learning and support.
  • Retaining a Diverse Workforce: Consider granting BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) educators Professional Teacher Status (PTS), which protects their voice,  as early as allowed by law and adopt regular meetings between them and the superintendent. 

PLEASE SUPPORT BROOKLINE EDUCATORS BY SENDING THE MESSAGE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/brookline-select-board-school-committee-transfer-the-funds/

 

Filed Under: Community, Featured News, Negotiations Tagged With:

Please support BEU call for an anti-racist contract

March 20, 2022

Brookline has long been known for its progressive values, quality of life, and engaged citizenry. Today, an increasing number of Brookline residents are calling on the town’s governance bodies and departments to identify and eliminate the structural barriers to participation in Brookline civic life that keep our community from becoming more racially and economically diverse. Such barriers limit access to resources, leave bias unaddressed, and allow the growing wealth gap within our school communities to widen. The Brookline Educators Union is trying to eliminate some of these barriers through the collective bargaining process. We are attempting to stabilize and increase the racial and ethnic diversity of the school staff at every school and all job categories to better and more sustainably meet the needs of all of our students, paying particular attention to the needs of our students of color.

In order to reach this goal, the BEU is calling for a contract between the BEU and the School Committee with provisions that will:

  1. Attract and retain teachers from under-represented groups by endeavoring to award Professional Teacher Status (PTS), as early as allowed by law: when first hired or after their first year. PTS confers due process rights and such protections make it easier to speak out and exercise leadership. In addition, require that the central office administrators meet with these new teachers regularly to ensure that they are welcomed and supported. Brookline regularly recruits highly effective educators from other districts, who give up PTS in order to join our district. This proposal does not force the Superintendent to award PTS early and would not add additional money to the budget.
  2. Hire individuals from the Brookline and Boston neighborhoods of our under-represented students into much needed job categories of paraprofessionals — building, lunch and recess monitors and building aides with a dignified, living wage. This will help address the problem of over-scheduling and under-staffing, opening up needed time for teachers and specialists to prep and meet with students and one another, and limit the pulling of paras from their assigned students to cover these duties.
  3. Pay all educators enough to give a more diverse staff the capacity to gain and maintain a foothold in the middle class if they make a career in the Public Schools of Brookline. The BEU is asking for a 9% cost of living increase over 3 years.

Hiring and retaining the diverse staff our schools depend on requires funding staffing and scheduling that demonstrates respect for the dignity of teaching. Unfortunately the school district has moved in the opposite direction; rejecting our proposals and threatening to impose a contract on educators that would increase the length of the K8 school day for no pay, weaken the right to uphold the contract through grievances, and limit exercise of autonomy by teachers. That stance is damaging morale and making the district less attractive to talented educators. 

This community has always stood with its educators and we hope you will join us now in our call for a contract that will attract and retain a more racially and ethnically diverse staff to meet the needs of all our students.

COMMUNITY MEMBERS–PLEASE SUPPORT EDUCATORS BY SIGNING THIS PETITION:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/brookline-select-board-school-committee-transfer-the-funds/

 

Filed Under: Community, Contract Campaign News, Featured News, Negotiations, Uncategorized Tagged With:

We can secure the legacy of Brookline’s excellent schools

January 28, 2022

 

We can secure the legacy of Brookline’s excellent schools

 

Be it ending structural racism, making teaching in Brookline a sustainable career, respecting the professional judgment of those in the classroom,  or responding to the educators’ urgent demands to address untenable working conditions, the management of the Brookline Public Schools is demonstrating a gross lack of commitment to the quality of our schools. 

 

BEU educators are dedicated to working with district management to secure a legacy of excellent Brookline schools. Sadly, the attorney employed by the school district is advising the school committee to not make contractual commitments with the BEU in regard to several issues that educators– the BEU members –  have raised as bargaining priorities. 

  

The school committee will not agree to the following: to strengthening due process protections for educators of color so they can bring their desperately needed voices forward. They will not commit to stopping the erosion of the economic value of public school teaching in Brookline.  Nor will the committee members  provide for proper staffing needed to deliver the services that they are promising families and that educators need for manageable workloads. 

 

When the district had time in the budgeting process to commit to what educators knew was needed, they squandered it by finalizing a budget that did not pay its labor bill.  When the BEU changed our proposals to give the district more time — over a year and a half — to plan fiscally, the school committee said “no.”  Rather than work with us, the committee members went in the opposite direction and dug in on a bargaining package which suddenly diminished union rights and increased the length of the school day, unpaid. 

 

Now, the Brookline School Committee is abusing a system that is supposed to uphold collective bargaining rights.  While maintaining no more than a veneer of good faith bargaining by offering only miniscule changes to proposals, the committee has manufactured an impasse that can eventually be used to justify an endgame where management imposes their “last best offer” on the table prior to mediation.  To that end, the school committee is holding pay hostage to those proposals submitted very late in the game — proposals that we could never accept — insisting that they will stay in a package offer until and unless we give in on pay.  That’s not right.

 

In the meantime, Brookline educators have been forced to take it upon themselves to make workloads tenable.  At the beginning of February, parents and guardians will see that the comments on report cards will not be as detailed as they have been in the past.  Teachers simply no longer have the time to do everything that is being asked of them within the confines of a reasonable work day.  Our priority remains providing the best possible education to all of our students, and that task requires a degree of planning, preparation, and collaboration among colleagues, all of which the school committee is saying it will not talk with us about. The committee’s actions are an insult to educators and a disservice to students and the greater community.

 

Brookline can afford a fair contract for educators

 

For several years, the School Committee and Town administration have diminished the investment made in the Public Schools of Brookline. Spending on Brookline public schools has shrunk as a percentage of the overall town budget despite the increase in students and services provided. Our community has crossed the line from fiscal responsibility to damaging austerity.

 

The Brookline Educators Union is fighting for a fair contract, one that the town can afford and that delivers the quality of education that our students deserve.

 

Revenue is available: 

  • Brookline has underestimated its tax revenues by roughly $5.9 million annually for the past five fiscal years. 
  • The town and schools also have access to tens of millions of dollars through the federal government’s Covid-relief programs. These funds can bridge initial expenses of meeting staffing and wage needs and allow for time to plan future budgets.
  •  

Reasonable approach to planning:

  • To meet staffing needs, the schools do not need to hire only full-time certified teachers for every position necessary to allow for the adequate preparation, planning and collaboration time that the BEU is bargaining for.   Our educational support professional workforce can be expanded. 
  • The BEU’s proposed cost of living adjustments barely keep up with inflation and routine wage increases for professionals. The BEU is also flexible with the structure of the wage package in order to give the town ample time for budget planning.
  • By agreeing to the racial justice protections the BEU is proposing, the school system can do better in attracting and retaining a staff that is diverse in national origin, ethnicity, and race, which our schools need.
  •  

Brookline educators are well-paid in comparison to other similar districts, however, salaries actually grow less competitive the longer an educator works in our district.  The salary “steps” are not raises, but rather they are an incremental progression through a wage scale that provides a discount to the PSB for every educator not on the top step. Brookline must make the value of each step fair and equitable for the duration of an educator’s career, valuing the educator’s experience and adjusting for increased living costs.

 

Brookline public schools are reaching a breaking point

 

The Public Schools of Brookline have long been regarded as among the best public schools not only in the state, but also in the entire country.  Yet, the legacy and reputation of PSB are in jeopardy. The lack of investment that the School Committee and the  PSB Administration are willing to make in our schools is taking its toll. Every year it becomes harder for educators in Brookline to maintain the tradition of providing a dynamic, comprehensive and challenging course of learning for every student we work with.

 

Quite simply, the austerity budgets we continually face make it increasingly difficult—and in some cases impossible — to teach to the whole child.

  

The Brookline Educators Union is trying to reverse that trend through contract negotiations. 

 

Staffing is at a crisis level.

 

  • It takes adequate staffing to provide high-quality programs and to create new programs that our students need and deserve. We have built a K-8 World languages program. We have greatly increased inclusion programs for students with significant special education needs. We are creating more programs around racial justice. We are expanding social and emotional learning advisory offerings to students. We must start developing a robust environmental education curriculum that is central to all of our students’ learning.    
  • Our existing staff is excellent, but it has not grown at the same rate that demands on staff time have grown. Federal, state and local mandates have piled on responsibilities that in many cases are not congruent with the BEU’s mission or PSB’s legacy of teaching the whole child. Rather than forgo beneficial learning experiences to address mandates, Brookline educators have worked tirelessly to protect professional autonomy that has long benefited our students. At current staffing levels, there just is not enough time in a 24 hour day to get everything done.
  • Our staff of color and staff with national origins other than the U.S. are being taxed with added responsibilities that are insufficiently supported by working conditions and pay that will strengthen hiring and retention and increase respect on the job.  They are relied upon too heavily to address diversity, inclusion and racial justice, while not being provided the support necessary to thrive. 

Wages have not kept pace:

 

  • Pay in Brookline has flatlined, a problem that is hidden behind the appearance of increases on steps that are designed to delay the achievement of professional pay.  The pay has also failed to reflect how job responsibilities for educators have soared.  In essence, the town has been demanding more while not paying for more, either through raises or increased staff. 

Respect educators’ professionalism:

 

  • Effective teaching requires effective planning. Educators are asking for small amounts of guaranteed time to prepare and to collaborate. The BEU is also advocating for educator-driven professional development.
  •  

The BEU takes pride in the quality of education provided to our students. We cannot tolerate a work environment that feels like constant triage. And we refuse to simply “check the box” for mandates and initiatives and consider that an adequate education.

 

Support the BEU in its work to bargain a fair contract with the  Brookline School Committee and demand that the town once again value—and properly invest in — its public schools.  

 

Filed Under: Community, Contract Campaign News, Featured News Tagged With:

Presentation of BEU Unit A proposals to the School Committee 01/10/2021

January 10, 2022

Common Planning Time:

Last month, the School Committee issued the following public statement:  

” – when teachers aren’t in front of students, someone else needs to be with them.  That means additional hires.”  The BEU does not disagree; it is a fact that since well before Covid the schools have been understaffed for the level of service that is being delivered to students. If the community expects this level of service to continue, then corresponding investments in staffing must be made, or the community should be made aware that the district can no longer bear the cost of the resources necessary to provide these services or programming.

Our team heard from building Principals in a bargaining session that scheduling common prep time was difficult and while we are holding firm that this time is needed for educators, we would propose that the time could be implemented into building schedules no later than 6/30/2023 to take effect for the 2023-2024 school year.  While we know that Common Planning is crucial for grade level teams, teachers of specials, and related service providers / caseload educators to meet and plan curriculum, tiered intervention strategies, and brainstorm issues that arise for individuals or groups of students, we are willing to take the next school year to allow for necessary schedule and staffing adjustments.

 

Daily Prep Time:

As part of the public statement referenced above, the School Committee stated that its position on —“Fair workload” for language, art and music teachers”  is that – “when teachers teach fewer students, that also means additional hires.”  This is read by the team as acknowledgement that the current situation of teachers of specials and world language teachers is indeed UNFAIR.  Additionally, we are not in disagreement that this would mean more hires; if this is not something that the schools are able to do, then the town should be informed that the level of service to which they are accustomed will need to change.

Our team remains committed to securing a daily preparation period of no less than 45 minutes for every educator.  This change will make schedules more equitable throughout and across buildings.  It is more evident than ever before that educators need time each day to plan, breathe, conduct other “self care” exercises, and take a break, even if it is a short one.  

Commitment to Retention of Staff of Color:

At the Brookline School Committee meeting on 1/7/2022, this issue was thrust to the forefront of discussions around how our students see themselves represented in the buildings where they “live” every day.  Our team has crafted language that we think both expresses a tangible and measurable commitment to recruit and retain staff of color.  In this same public statement, we heard that “we do not need language in a specific employment contract to be strongly committed as a district to diversity, equity and inclusion.”  We are baffled by this position.  We see contract language as the very vehicle by which both parties can affirm their commitment to this valuable effort.  We look forward to hearing language that you would accept that could lead to a common understanding of what diversity and equity could look like in the Public Schools of Brookline, but absent such commitment, we will stand by the language we proposed in November, which in no way limits the judgment of the superintendent and is zero cost.

JLMC:

When we first began the discussions to the successor contract in early 2020, this team of BEU Negotiators had 15 pages of thoughtfully formulated proposals that addressed issues of scheduling and workload. After meeting with hundreds of members (and people in the community), we distilled a set of issues such as preparation time, caseload and class size, teaching minutes, expansion of “4+1” into departmentalized grade levels, duties, extra help opportunities, office hours, stipend administrative positions, and others.  

The concerns and solutions we presented were affirmed by the school committee as timely and legitimate. Yet we were told repeatedly that these issues were better addressed through administration than in a collective bargaining agreement.  While we insist that the parameters of working conditions do indeed belong in a contract because this ensures fairness, consistency, and transparency, we also appreciate that the people who work most closely with students understand directly how well schools are functioning well or not.  Recognizing the value in a collaborative process undertaken by a group of administrators and educators who work closely together in the buildings day to day, we devised a plan that can bring their shared experience to bear on the ever evolving challenges we are facing in our schools.  We thus proposed a Joint Labor-Management Committee that would examine work activity and generate a “bargaining blueprint” for the next round of contract negotiations. We think all aspects of the contract pertaining to workload, including stipends, are relevant. The resulting report will be a recommendation, not contractual obligations for the BSC or responsibilities for Brookline educators.  We are therefore standing with our last proposal on this JLMC.

Wage Proposal:

Lastly, we would like to bring you up to date on our research around wages that lead to our proposal of nine percent over the three year contract.  Again, I reference the public statement from last month stating “if we were to agree to the request of 9% over 3 years, that would translate into a salary increase of $2M for next year.  **That would mean cutting somewhere between 25 and 30 teachers – the equivalent of eliminating all of the K-8 classroom teachers at Driscoll, Heath, Lincoln or Runkle, or eliminating music at all K-8s.  It would mean larger class sizes, reduced program offerings, or both. ** Clearly, that level of staffing cut would be detrimental to Brookline schools, which is why the negotiators have offered 6%, which is still a financial stretch but is in keeping with what other contracts near us have settled for, thus keeping Brookline teachers as the highest-paid among our peer districts”  There is a lot here to unpack, and let’s start with the last statement.  We are not aware of any “peer districts” having been discussed during these negotiations.  Are the districts mentioned in the public statement what you would propose that we are using for comparable districts if we end up in mediation or fact finding?

If so, we take it to be your position that your list are truly peer districts.  We would submit for the bargaining record our own list of peer districts: Acton-Boxborough, Arlington, Belmont, Concord-Carlisle, Dedham, Dover-Sherborn, Lexington, Lincoln-Sudbury, Natick, Needham, Newton, Somerville, Waltham, Watertown, Wellesley, Weston, Westwood, Winchester. 

We included all of yours even though some would be a stretch in terms of “comparable” but the list above would be amenable to the BEU.  

If you are not presenting these formally and prepared to justify your points of comparison, we would expect a public retraction of the suggestion that you have presented these as part of negotiations at any point and allowed the BEU to formally question your choices.  Should there be a need to engage in this conversation, we have a list ready for consideration that includes all of the districts mentioned and some others that we think are more similar to Brookline.

Again referencing the SC public statement: it references “Brookline teachers as the highest paid among peer districts.”  The concept of “peer districts’ ‘ notwithstanding, our research places Brookline 2nd or 3rd among the districts chosen by the SC for pay early in an educator’s career and 7th or 8th among those districts in pay later on.  We used the most current salary data from Brookline AND from those districts rather than salary numbers from three years ago.  I don’t know if it was stated publicly in that communication or not, but there is a number north of $100,000 that is floating out there as average educator pay in Brookline. We calculated the actual average pay based on the “scattergram” data that you provided and it comes out to just under $91,000, not including longevity or other benefits.  We would appreciate a public correction IF there has been a statement regarding that number.  

The public statement, however, makes no mention of the current levels of inflation.  As of November 2021, inflation since the expiration of the last contract (Aug 31, 2020) stands at 6.9%.  This means that the 6% “COLA” referenced as the “committee’s offer” represents a cut in pay of almost 1% with another 18 months of inflation not yet on the books.  Some believe that inflation will indeed begin to recede, but unless it turns negative, which is not a notion that is being entertained, that number of nearly 7% will not come down, but MAY (if we are lucky) lessen the slope of its ascent.  Inflation lessens the buying power of money and this round has been most influenced by energy, housing, and food which are the bulk of educator expenses no matter where they are on the salary scales.  Brookline’ scales have traditionally been among the higher scales in the state, which is appropriate given the cost of living in the greater Boston region.   That is why we have limited our ask to maybe cover the cost of living / inflationary pressure on income and not asked for a raise.  Our proposal would put the average pay for educators in Brookline just over $100,000 if there are no retirements and no new hires next year.  If there were, that number would obviously go down.  With the level of work and expectations of the community, we would not expect that our pay should be effectively cut.

This brings us to the actual COLA ask; we feel that the 9% (three percent over each of the three years of the contract) is both affordable and appropriate; in truth, it’s actually a good deal for the district.  Each year, quite apart from 35% enrollment growth, the district embarks on new initiatives and endeavors while refusing to allow time in the teacher day for these to take place.  We have been remiss in not insisting that we be compensated for this expansion of services in the Brookline school system. Instead, we insisted that time be carved out of the day and workloads be adjusted in order to make these things happen.  Again, we have repeatedly been told that “collective bargaining agreements are not the place for these manageable workload protections.”  So Brookline has gotten all this great programming while we have not demanded that it be paid for.  The town has been expanding the school system offerings while setting educator COLA’s at low levels of inflation, and thus has not had to go to the residents for overrides.  Well now inflation is high, and we need COLA’s that reflect that.  We have also heard that “there is no money for these COLA’s”, and while we disagree, we can respect that the budgets for School Year 2021 and 2022 have been set.  

We also respect that the budget for next year is being worked on right now and we will insist here and moving forward that budgets reflect the priority that educators be paid minimally for the rate of inflation; and also for any and all additional programming that comes with each school year.  Brookline needs to make a decision about what it can offer students in town and what that actually costs; educators do the work to make the programming function, we will not also bear the cost of the programs on our backs any longer.  

To this end, we remain firm at 9% over three years, but recognizing current budget commitments we would offer the following redistribution to our previous proposals:

YEAR ONE (2020-2021) 2% COLA retro to 9/1/2020

YEAR TWO (2021-2022) 2% COLA retro to 8/31/2021

YEAR THREE (2022-2023) 5% increase on ALL MONEY ITEMS IN THE CONTRACT

Year three involves a budget that has not been made yet, and we know that budgets are more than line items, they are statements of priorities.  

Our research has uncovered some “line items” that could be addressed to show that educators and education is a priority in Brookline.

  1. The difference between the 6% and 9% COLA proposals is about $2.6M over the life of the contract with most of that falling in the last year (2022-2023)   Over the past three years, Brookline has UNDERESTIMATED local receipts by an AVERAGE of almost $5.9M per year.  Should this pattern hold, half of this underestimation would fund the dollar difference in the two contract proposals.

 

  1. In our research, we looked at state reported finances of surrounding districts, including Brookline.  The average spending of “free cash” as a percentage of the operating budget was just over 7%.  Brookline’s was just over 4% putting it 11th out of 15 districts.  We looked at the same for “stabilization fund” dollars, and Brookline uses those monies for just over 2.5% of their budget while the average among the 15 districts is almost 6.5%, leaving Brooklne in 10th place. Brookline operates with debt as 5.9% of its budget placing it 11th (or 4th lowest) of these communities where the average community has debt as almost 10% of its budget.

 

Brookline is among the wealthiest municipalities in the commonwealth and current budget priorities are designed to facilitate three things. 

  1. Limit meaningful discussion of monetary priorities and additional expenditures by proscribing an arbitrary allocation of revenue through the school-town partnership.  
  2. Maintain low a property tax rate
  3. Maintain a Moody’s AAA bond rating before anything else.

 

The following data confirms the above and shows that there are untapped resources in town that would allow for full and robust funding of the schools and staff.  With over 80% of school funding going to staffing, there is no debate that Brookline schools ARE the educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators that make up the culture and “feel” of the building.  When we state that there is “wealth” in Brookline, it is because we know that:

  1. Brookline ranks 23rd out of 351 in per capita income ($95,466) according to the DOR
  2. Brookline ranks 27th out of 351 in property value per capita ($476,107)
  3. Yet Brookline ranks 313 out of 351 in terms of property tax rate (9.8%)
  4. Brookline has a prop 2.5 tax levy ceiling of over $700M.  Their actual tax levy is just shy of $275M.  What this means is that over the years since proposition two-and-a-half became law, Brookline property values have increased almost half a billion dollars more than taxes have been increased.  Brookline has a gap of almost 65% between what they could be taxing and what they are taxing under Prop 2 1/2.  That puts them 1st among the 15 communities referenced above in unused tax capacity, where the average “untaxed capacity” is 48%.  If the town is indeed “broke”, then it is by choice.

Filed Under: Featured News, Uncategorized Tagged With:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 29
  • Next Page »

Log In


Lost your password?

Need Help Signing In

You can retrieve your password by following this link Retrieve Password

BEU Calendar

« March 2023 » loading...
S M T W T F S
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1

MTA Info

Slideshow

71572985_10156527182556481_2961474637441007616_n
75340992_10156527182486481_5197738364710682624_n
75610779_10156527182431481_7222238012191539200_n
76705093_10156527182361481_580951325294985216_n
77200154_10156527182296481_2095998504928280576_n
75299781_10156527182241481_4811008913694523392_n
75627614_10156527182181481_4009689993332129792_n
78319007_10156527182086481_2934541198175502336_n
76779615_10156527182006481_4600587200164265984_n
78179402_10156527181926481_6567703352971362304_n
78045864_10156527181821481_7340512297602777088_n
75464267_10156527181751481_1819895600297017344_n
77318258_10156527181666481_4888432674231812096_n
77276017_10156527181611481_8390125678233649152_n
76647963_10156527181511481_4822376360687173632_n
75439241_10156527181426481_2614144089662160896_n
75569719_10156527181366481_7217270594750906368_n
75453544_10156527181311481_1311577609405988864_n
75394814_10156527181261481_6034144964563173376_n
78202874_10156527181176481_6314301665486831616_n
75593855_10156527181031481_4933908049954865152_n
77387958_10156527180966481_9190925324165054464_n
76695181_10156527180921481_6518092580872257536_n
75552940_10156527180771481_4429132496549969920_n
74328752_10156527180721481_7089642738152374272_n
73106913_10156527180641481_721401527582851072_n
77095163_10156527180566481_5310595171648274432_n
74989167_10156527180506481_8603826809747800064_n
76602147_10156527180416481_6754796595151110144_n
74185994_10156527180341481_1371592158095605760_n
74604757_10156527180196481_5602870573769162752_n
74169784_10156527180131481_8881237153963573248_n
75572083_10156527180061481_2332243301303844864_n
76686447_10156527179986481_338396586306437120_n
75380335_10156527179921481_8217248386961637376_n
75402150_10156527179841481_8823101730775367680_n
76697317_10156527179776481_4637793715870498816_n
75486021_10156527179706481_6981821080289673216_n
76756802_10156527179626481_7435463257034326016_n
77362202_10156527179541481_4601157086489870336_n
75472913_10156527179481481_1033752457248768000_n
76635068_10156527179276481_7071649878903881728_n
75102848_10156527179211481_3946248649150824448_n
73458832_10156527179161481_3635898341021188096_n
76710902_10156527179106481_4160953548881788928_n
75278253_10156527179051481_7460698023849361408_n
76697338_10156527179001481_8706999612189179904_n
75497654_10156527178911481_5192524471981834240_n
77015067_10156527178866481_4799429260957712384_n
75439500_10156527178781481_4959225082573488128_n
76654340_10156527178716481_1592310935458938880_n
76613075_10156527178631481_1142714385978884096_n
75271485_10156527178581481_5183944600498208768_n
73399913_10156527178516481_7474916663406624768_n
77380332_10156527178441481_790633273658179584_n
74505859_10156527178356481_6070150246636191744_n
75282174_10156527178276481_2620985903845212160_n
76769694_10156527178216481_246958549345763328_n
76602207_10156527178106481_106235659584274432_n
76195570_10156527178061481_4728173563083751424_n
77173198_10156527177961481_4228313969116315648_n
75341177_10156527177926481_6816645769185984512_n
77086468_10156527177861481_2482849572238393344_n
78549613_10156527177821481_1522192828392800256_n
76771526_10156527177691481_5267226760851750912_n
78228830_10156527177621481_8046835449139822592_n
76765485_10156527177541481_7603655834203062272_n
76905575_10156527177496481_1331044991056740352_n
72650894_10156527177446481_426676447915016192_n
75439387_10156529791796481_7605026216533295104_n
74906685_10156529791711481_4507321195057643520_n
75472800_10156529791621481_8273844695734419456_n
78324959_10156529791546481_4421978292215611392_n
76200953_10156529791461481_7810043851887869952_n
76604994_10156529791346481_7297806789238587392_n
76184068_10156529791251481_407966642660704256_n
76702356_10156529791141481_7145824419372335104_n
77050195_10156529791071481_6171278326817095680_n
76262118_10156529790946481_1521840576650018816_n
76646858_10156529790816481_7354573844436221952_n
76654443_10156529790711481_3955329172087242752_n
75653344_10156529790616481_8802692329652617216_n
77429104_10156529790511481_7189871576735547392_n
78378284_10156529790386481_7367155251050184704_n
77223478_10156529790331481_4072090100001931264_n
75540050_10156529790256481_2804853917643440128_n
75388427_10156529790171481_9131014529000407040_n
74458866_10156529790111481_5162929256799404032_n
76638469_10156529789951481_6601920893562126336_n
75594549_10156529789851481_2305702984689909760_n
78282726_10156529789681481_7478362043221803008_n
75594656_10156529789581481_411080395166056448_n
75429550_10156529789446481_7820025536272400384_n
78077156_10156529789326481_2266808070094979072_n
75302638_10156529789251481_1403549777089527808_n
75341222_10156529789091481_2310894792696922112_n
76640157_10156529788896481_5187039085780271104_n
74638368_10156529788741481_2188673874722291712_n
75310395_10156529788646481_155301962974232576_n
76204363_10156529788536481_5335884725066137600_n
77019497_10156529788476481_5122369432491917312_n
76605039_677150779359738_1323139730086297600_o-1
73513511_677150702693079_7154439286249488384_o
75543579_677150726026410_1967170754726330368_o-1
76757017_677150712693078_1666987196827041792_o
75439479_677152486026234_8272101604732174336_o-1
76652219_677151109359705_9001966794868523008_o-1
75424699_677151762692973_6641199739578613760_o-1
78104674_677152879359528_4127313814536323072_o-1
78156053_677153036026179_5985210482309464064_o-1
76901297_677150822693067_1623452734004920320_o-1
76769616_677151392693010_6148900232944943104_o-1
75594484_677151002693049_3594900335560228864_o
75580222_677151459359670_9125232089975750656_o-1
75449997_677152402692909_8725789007482454016_o
75485989_677151679359648_8845943724065161216_o-1
77317549_677151639359652_1249825755035074560_o-1
74522905_677152276026255_3648899829796438016_o
75462303_677151902692959_1485568976539877376_o
74649831_677152732692876_8738859679590907904_o-1
75627592_677152499359566_922905609106358272_o-1
75220761_677152439359572_2063443309954596864_o-1
75418843_677151629359653_1948648334600175616_o-1
77271149_677150926026390_1942882027472683008_o-1
77092671_677151212693028_3350264903960100864_o-1
75311432_677151326026350_646064824798674944_o-1
76258126_677151972692952_5463950530889908224_o-1
75323307_677152259359590_5835573615558393856_o-1
77426044_677151579359658_3781059156065124352_o-1
77303019_677151082693041_7258404497272078336_o-1
76622735_677151052693044_2451552738257928192_o-1
76693193_677151302693019_1328326912413532160_o-1
76695115_677151406026342_3487830601917005824_o-1
75317334_677150902693059_6471376011140268032_o-1
75398228_677153009359515_6207596827970109440_o-1
75349034_677151912692958_6976518741299298304_o-1
76993623_677152322692917_1402407135400165376_o-1
75299806_677152766026206_3274224732777480192_o-1
75481736_677151126026370_7359079823475474432_o-1
72473196_677152129359603_8274354491172585472_o-1
76197817_677152839359532_7247743241687138304_o-1
75576364_677152616026221_1383416542363910144_o-1
76720817_677151496026333_6749275161289031680_o-1
78058586_677151546026328_4808466159911305216_o-1
73250462_677152866026196_4072139462061064192_o-1
76972165_677152139359602_3188504963735093248_o-1
76756947_677151832692966_4240348420235067392_o-1
75231815_677152626026220_6538212453954617344_o-1
76967208_677152186026264_6984797290762338304_o-1
76267355_677152756026207_43375828205043712_o-1
77261230_677152602692889_6164321721043124224_o-1
75534259_677150932693056_5577135288645320704_o-1
76898914_677152369359579_5248627134393483264_o-1
69855955_677153019359514_8036579247625601024_o-1
76913759_677151282693021_5167290113188691968_o-1
76620889_677151786026304_8675767237077893120_o-1
78606874_677151029359713_2293491220141309952_o-1
76686507_10219715883508795_442342207983190016_o-1
IMG_1595
IMG_1594
IMG_1591
IMG_1592
IMG_1596
IMG_1597
IMG_1600
IMG_1598
IMG_1601
IMG_1603
IMG_1604
IMG_1605
IMG_1608
IMG_1609
IMG_1610
IMG_1611
IMG_1613
IMG_1614
IMG_1615
IMG_1616
IMG_1617
IMG_1621
IMG_1619
IMG_1622
IMG_1623
IMG_1627
IMG_1629
IMG_1630
IMG_1631
IMG_1632
IMG_1633

Categories

Archives

Latest Local Union News

  • BACK TO SCHOOL!
  • School Committee Forces BEU to Strike
  • Without Contract, Brookline Educators Authorize Strike for Monday, May 16
  • BEU submits counter-offer to School Committee on May 10, 2022

Follow Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

BEU Latest Tweets

  • Congrats to BEU member & Brookline Middle School Science teacher Mark Goldner! @BrooklinePublic @BeuBrookline https://t.co/kH91JdejG3 March 25, 2023 11:15 pm
  • I just signed a @theactionnet petition: Support Malden's Public School Educators. Sign here: https://t.co/5Z69rUhic9 September 16, 2022 11:09 am
  • Take the Pledge - NO CONTRACT NO COFFEE https://t.co/2l0fsbEf7y August 26, 2022 7:03 pm

RSS MTA News

  • Union News: The power of democratized, open bargaining March 28, 2023
  • The latest news about upcoming public education campaigns, actions and events March 21, 2023
  • Full steam ahead for Higher Ed for All March 15, 2023

RSS MTA Events

  • 2023 ESP Conference
  • "Raising Multicultural Kids" in the Classroom: Educator Training (PreK-6)
  • Using Anti-Bias Literature & Social-Emotional Learning to Promote Equity & Inclusion in Your Class

Copyright (C) 2023 · Brookline Educators Union · Part of the MTASITES NETWORK